http://en.posztukiwania.pl/wp-content/themes/special-theme
Navigation Menu
  • Blog
  • News
  • About me
  • Media
  • Lectures
Home » Blog » Masculinity of the 16th century
Mon28

Masculinity of the 16th century

Magdalena Łanuszka :: in Oct 28, 2019 :: in Blog :: 0 comments

Federico II Gonzaga, the ruler of Mantua, decided one day that he wants to have a nice summer residence, and he commissioned Palazzo del Te, completed in 1525-1534 by an architect and painter Giulio Romano, pupil of Raphael. I have once mentioned Giulio Romano before, in a post on erotic renaissance prints (available HERE), and it must be said that the decorations of Palazzo del Te are also not very modest. That was the spirit of the age: most of the elites back then appreciated carnal pleasures – kings and princes as well as cardinals and popes. Of course, they had to pay the price for that: for example, Federico II Gonzaga did not manage to enjoy his palace for a long time because he died in 1540. He passed away at the age of 40, but did not perish gloriously in a battle; the cause of his death was syphilis.

Maria F. Maurer in her PhD thesis ” The Palazzo del Te and the Spaces of Masculinity in Early Modern Italy” (Indiana University 2012) proves that decoration of Palazzo del Te was a display of idealised masculinity; that it was supposed to stress the authority of the Gonzaga prince and present Federico and his heirs as divine rulers, virile lovers and dynamic leaders. Indeed, the mythological scenes decorating walls and ceilings of the chambers in this palace are full of love stories, and their compositions expose nakedness of the heroes. It is particularly visible in case of ceiling frescoes, as we watch the figures in quite a peculiar perspective.

In my opinion, especially intriguing is a composition of a painting in the chamber dedicated to Sun and Moon (Camera del Sole e della Luna): we may see two chariots with gods related to Sun (Apollo) and Moon (Diana), and both figures are seen from below. However, the admirers of female beauty may be disappointed: Diana does not present her carnal attributes. Meanwhile, Apollo does…

I am not entirely sure if that may be read as display of masculinity; and even more strange case is a fragment of the decoration of chamber dedicated to Psyche (Camera di Psiche), depicting river Styx. According to ancient traditions, personification of a river is a bearded man (a god of particular river; according to the Greek mythology, 3000 sons of Thetys and Titan Oceanus were the gods of rivers), leaning over a jug of water representing a spring. However in this case the water does not originate only from the jug, but also comes from the man’s beard and… his penis! Moreover, this god does not seem to impersonate the ideal of male beauty.

A different case is my favourite piece of decoration from the same chamber, that is a depiction of conception of Alexander the Great. According to the legend mentioned by Plutarch, the official father of Alexander, that is king Philip II of Macedon, one day saw a snake in his wife’s bed. His wife was Olympias, princess of Epirus. Philip figured out that perhaps she was cheating on him and went to the oracle in Delphi to find out if his suspicions were correct. The oracle revealed that he actually saw his wife with god Zeus-Ammon (Greek Zeus has been identified with Egyptian Ammon-Ra), and that the god impregnated Olympia, disguised as snake or dragon. That story was supposed to prove that Alexander the Great was half-god. Meanwhile, king Philip received prophecy that he would be punished for peeking on god: he was going to loose his eye. Indeed, in 354 BC and arrow removed Philip’s eye during a siege of Metona.

The depiction of conception of Alexander the Great by Zeus-dragon occurred in medieval manuscripts; my favourite version is a Netherlandish miniature in Les faize d’Alexandre (Quintus Curtius Rufus, translated by Vasco da Lucena, ca. 1468–1475, British Library in London, Burney 169, fol. 14).

But the depiction in Palazzo del Te is much more graphic: here we see Zeus approaching Olympias, obviously ready to conceive an offspring. In this case it is not exactly an inter-species intercourse (is that how we may call what is in the medieval miniature?), as Zeus turned to dragon only in the part of his legs (Olimpias may even not have noticed that). The rest of Zeus is purely human and undoubtedly attractive.

Interestingly, the image contains also the depiction of immediate fulfill of the prophecy about punishment: we may see Philip’s eye being removed by the lightning thrown by the eagle (Zeus’ attribute). I’m not sure if that fresco may be called the “display of masculinity”; it surely provides a conclusion that husband should never spy on his unfaithful wife. Philip raised Alexander as his son anyway – but he had to manage with only one eye.

***

The PhD thesis I referred to is available in the service academia.edu.



Post a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Crypto-dildo?
  • Copy, imitation or forgery?
  • Talk in Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague
  • Us and the War
  • On-line conference on Saints in art (in Polish)

Recent Comments

  • Magdalena Łanuszka on Lascivious “Lascivie”
  • Michael Guest on Lascivious “Lascivie”
  • Mark on Transsexualism?
  • Magdalena Łanuszka on Us and the War
  • Alan Scarfe on Us and the War

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014

Categories

  • Blog
  • Lectures
  • Media
  • News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Tags

19th century 20th century animals Antiquity architecture art market Bible carnival Central Europe Christ customs death devil Early-modern fresco history Holy Spirit legend literature manuscripts Middle Ages mosaics Muse mythology Old Masters painting photography portrait prints relics Religious art Saints sculpture sex sexuality still life Virgin Mary wine

Designed by Fragrance Design © 2013 | Powered by WordPress

×

By using this website you allow us to place cookies on your computer for analytics.

However, if you would like to, you can change your cookie settings at any time.