http://en.posztukiwania.pl/wp-content/themes/special-theme
Navigation Menu
  • Blog
  • News
  • About me
  • Media
  • Lectures
Home » Blog » Original fake
Wed19

Original fake

Magdalena Łanuszka :: in Aug 19, 2015 :: in Blog :: 0 comments

The works of art created by the Old Masters (especially those of famous names) are able to achieve huge prices. From time to time there is a “discovery” of an unknown masterpiece, kept for generations in private collection, or more often simply overpainted and re-discovered in renovation. Of course there is a possibility of making money on fake discoveries – and so there are the art forgers. Today I would like to tell you about one of them, whose paintings may still be present in many museums and galleries.

Han van Meegeren was born in Holland in 1889. He loved dutch Golden Age painting, that is: of the 17th century. He became a painter against his father’s will and wanted to paint as the Old Masters did: with the precision of the details, creating the illusion of the reality and playing with chiaroscuro and with the viewers’ emotions. Unfortunately, Han was born in the wrong time for such an art – in 1920’s and 1930’s Europe turned towards modern avant-garde art. No-one was interested in the painting that seemed academic and referred to the traditions of the Old Masters. If one wants to have a realistic image of something, one should take a photo! Van Meegeren felt that no-one values the traditional painter’s skills anymore, while many people were still interested in paying huge amount of money for a genuine Old Master’s picture. His incredible forgeries were in a way a revenge of the rejected artist: he painted as he liked, but he was paid for his works as if they were 17th century masterpieces.

800px-Jan_Vermeer_van_Delft_021

Han van Meegeren decided to become Jan Vermeer van Delft – he did not copy his works but he actually created brand new ones! Jan Vermeer (1632-1675) was one the most famous Dutch Old Masters who created excellent and very intimate genre paintings, but was rather forgotten for centuries and “discovered” in 19th century. Not many of his works survived – only some above 30 paintings are attributed to him today. They are very distinctive because of their atmosphere of silence and concentration and the luminous juxtapositions of blue and yellow colours.

800px-Johannes_(Jan)_Vermeer_-_Christ_in_the_House_of_Martha_and_Mary_-_Google_Art_Project

The biggest gap in the Vermeer’s oeuvre are his early works – there is one signed painting “Christ in the House of Martha and Mary” (above; kept in Scottish National Gallery in Edinburgh) which proves that in 1650’s Vermeer actually painted religious subject matters. That was the starting point for van Meegeren: he decided to create non-existing early religious works by Vermeer! “Early” works can always be of a lower artistic quality than the late works – that enables creating a perfect forgery: the painting that is not specific enough to be a copy and does not contain the characteristic elements for classic works of the master. In 1936 van Meegeren painted “The Supper at Emmaus” that was accepted as original Vermeer by the most respected expert on the subject, Abraham Bredius! The painting was purchased for 520 000 guilders and donated to Museum Boijmans Van Beuningen in Rotterdam.

2010-De-valse-Vermeers-van-Van-Meegeren--1967479231How come such a forgery could have been accepted in 20th century? Well, van Meegeren was well-prepared for all the possible tests. He purchased the old painting and scratched out the paint, so he could have a genuine 17th century canvas, but without any image that would come out with an X-Ray. He prepared all the paints in traditional way, mixing them by himself from raw materials – he never used the paints produced in 20th century. Technically he actually created the 17th century paintings! The biggest problem though was aging the picture: he needed something to dry the paint so it could pass the test of the alcohol (which affects the oil paint that is not older than few decades), which was quite popular way of detecting the forgeries back then. Also, he needed to create cracks that occur on the surface of the painting that is several hundreds years old. After some experiments he found a brilliant solution: he achieved his goal by adding  phenol formaldehyde (bakelite) to the paint and then baking the painting in a special oven. As a result he managed to create a painting that could pass all the tests, as of course no-one would think about testing the paint for phenol formaldehyde!

Hans_10

Van Meegeren started to live a life of a rich man, as he earned quite a lot on “discovered” masterpieces. It all broke down one day because of the Europe’s history… in 1945 a new Vermeer (“Christ with the Adulteress”)  was discovered among the masterpieces belonging to Hermann Göring… The investigation led to van Meegeren and suddenly he found himself accused of collaboration with the Nazis and was going to be on trial for selling the Dutch national treasure to the enemy! At this point van Meegeren decided to save himself by admitting that he is a forger. To prove his “innocence” during the trial he painted another “unknown Vermeer” – “Young Christ among the Doctors”. Finally he was only sentenced as a forger to serve 1 year in prison; however, he went bankrupt due to the claims of the deceived buyers and because of unpaid taxes.

Han-van-Meegeren-fake

In fact, the whole van Meegeren problem is not over yet, as he did not report all his forgeries, so many “van Meegerens” are still in various museums, displayed as genuine Old Masters. In some cases collectors paid lots of money for them and later donated them to the museums, so now it would be awkward to prove that those paintings are fakes. On the other hand, nowadays “genuine van Meegeren” may be worth even more than a 17th century copy of some painting! One thing is certain: van Meegeren proved how unreliable may be the opinion of the expert, which used to be the most respected factor in attributing and dating the artworks. Today no-one would just trust the specialist’s eye, we want to have a comprehensive technical examination of every painting, which became more important than any connoisseurship. So what do we actually value in art? Is it a unique theme and the master’s vision? Is it the technique or the skills of the Old Masters? Is it the oldness of the canvas? Well, van Meegeren offered all of that. His art was just not appreciated when he tried to sell it under his own name.

 

***

You can read more about van Meegeren in many books, for example F. Wynne, I was Vermeer: the rise and fall of the twentieth century’s greatest forger (2006). I very much recommend you an episode of the series “Fake or Fortune”, dedicated to the painting that is suspected to be by van Meegeren:

 



Post a Reply Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Crypto-dildo?
  • Copy, imitation or forgery?
  • Talk in Czech Academy of Sciences in Prague
  • Us and the War
  • On-line conference on Saints in art (in Polish)

Recent Comments

  • Magdalena Łanuszka on Lascivious “Lascivie”
  • Michael Guest on Lascivious “Lascivie”
  • Mark on Transsexualism?
  • Magdalena Łanuszka on Us and the War
  • Alan Scarfe on Us and the War

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014

Categories

  • Blog
  • Lectures
  • Media
  • News

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Tags

19th century 20th century animals Antiquity architecture art market Bible carnival Central Europe Christ customs death devil Early-modern fresco history Holy Spirit legend literature manuscripts Middle Ages mosaics Muse mythology Old Masters painting photography portrait prints relics Religious art Saints sculpture sex sexuality still life Virgin Mary wine

Designed by Fragrance Design © 2013 | Powered by WordPress

×

By using this website you allow us to place cookies on your computer for analytics.

However, if you would like to, you can change your cookie settings at any time.